Pm Weekly Review

Structure a PM's weekly review and planning session. Use when doing a weekly PM review, writing a weekly update, preparing for Monday planning, or reviewing sprint health. Produces a shareable weekly update covering metrics movement, shipping progress, blockers, insights, and next week's top 3 priorities.

Published by @Mohit Aggarwal·from mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills·0 agent reads / 30d·0 saves·

PM Weekly Review Skill

Turn the chaotic end-of-week brain dump into a structured 20-minute ritual that keeps you, your team, and your stakeholders aligned — without a meeting.

The Weekly Review Structure (20 minutes)

5 min — Metrics check: What moved? What didn't? What's surprising? 5 min — Ship progress: What shipped? What slipped? What's blocked? 5 min — Insights: Any customer feedback, support tickets, or research findings? 5 min — Next week priorities: What are the 3 things that matter most?


Output Format

PM Weekly Review — Week of [Date]

Product Area: [What you own] Written by: [PM Name] Time to read: ~3 minutes


📊 Metrics This Week

MetricThis WeekLast WeekTargetTrend
[Primary metric][Value][Value][Target]↑ / ↓ / →
[Secondary metric][Value][Value][Target]↑ / ↓ / →
[Health metric][Value][Value][Target]↑ / ↓ / →

Notable movement:

  • [What changed and why — 1 sentence each]

Concern to watch:

  • [Anything trending in the wrong direction]

🚢 This Week's Progress

Shipped:

  • ✅ [What went live] — [1-line impact or observation]

In Progress:

  • 🔄 [Feature/initiative] — [% complete or current status]

Slipped / Blocked:

  • ⚠️ [What didn't happen] — Reason: [brief] — Action: [who's unblocking it]

Carry-forward to next week:

  • [Item + why it's carrying over]

💡 Insights & Signals

Customer feedback:

  • "[Quote or paraphrase]" — Source: [user/channel] — Theme: [tag]

Support signals:

  • [Top ticket category this week + volume]
  • [Anything that signals a product gap]

Research / data:

  • [Any discovery from user interviews, analytics, or experiments]

🎯 Next Week — Top 3 Priorities

#PriorityWhy This WeekOwnerDone =
1[Most important thing][Reason it can't wait][Name][Clear definition of done]
2[Second priority][Why][Name][Done criteria]
3[Third priority][Why][Name][Done criteria]

Decisions needed:

  • [Any decision that's blocking progress — who needs to make it]

Asks / dependencies:

  • [What you need from engineering / design / data / leadership]

🧠 Reflection (Optional but powerful)

What's one thing from this week I'd do differently? [Your honest answer — 1–2 sentences]

What's the biggest unknown I'm carrying into next week? [Name the uncertainty explicitly]


Required Inputs

Ask the user for these if not provided:

  • Product area or team you own
  • Key metrics this week (with values and prior week comparison)
  • What shipped, slipped, or is blocked
  • Top 3 priorities for next week
  • Any customer insights or signals (optional)

Quality Checks

  • Metrics include period-over-period comparison (not just raw numbers)
  • Every blocked item has an owner and a specific unblocking action
  • Next week's priorities have a "why this week" rationale
  • Total length is under 400 words (skimmable in 3 minutes)
  • Reflection section is honest, not aspirational

Anti-Patterns

  • Do not report metrics without comparing to target or the prior week — absolute numbers without context are not useful
  • Do not list blockers without a named owner and proposed resolution — unowned blockers stay blocked
  • Do not write a weekly review that is longer than one page — it must be scannable in under 2 minutes
  • Do not include more than 3 priorities for next week — a list of 8 "top priorities" means nothing is prioritised
  • Do not skip the insights section — observations that inform future decisions are a PM's key value add

Guidelines

  • Keep the whole document under 400 words — if stakeholders won't read it, it doesn't exist
  • The reflection section is for you, not your stakeholders — keep it honest
  • Always name a clear owner for every blocked item — "the team will figure it out" is a blocker in disguise
  • Recommend sending this by end of Friday — Monday morning is too late to course-correct
  • If three weeks of weekly reviews show the same blocked item, escalate immediately

Bundled with this artifact

1 file

Reference files that ship alongside this artifact. Agents pull these in only when the task needs them.

More on the bench

SKILL0

Product Launch Checklist

Generate a comprehensive pre-launch, launch day, and post-launch checklist for any product release. Use when preparing for a product launch, feature release, or major update. Produces a role-assigned, tiered checklist covering engineering readiness, marketing and comms, support, and post-launch monitoring.

product-management+1
33
SKILL0

Launch Readiness

Assesses pre-launch readiness across every function and produces an explicit Go / Conditional Go / No-Go recommendation. Use when preparing for any product or feature launch, running a pre-launch review, or determining whether a release is safe to ship. Produces a function-by-function readiness status, a ranked blockers list with owners and deadlines, a risk register, and a clearly reasoned launch recommendation.

product-management+2
31
SKILL0

Iso42001 Specialist

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management System (AIMS) specialist for compliance teams running internal audits. Three decisions: (1) Where are the gaps against Clauses 4-10 and what do we close first? (2) What goes in the AI risk register and which Annex A controls treat each risk? (3) What's the 12-month internal audit plan that satisfies Clause 9.2? Use when preparing for certification, scoping internal audit cycles, or onboarding AI systems into an existing ISMS (27001) / QMS (13485) program. NOT an executive AI strategy skill (see chief-ai-officer-advisor). NOT EU AI Act compliance (see compliance-team-eu-ai-act).

compliance+2
31