Deal Desk

Use when reviewing a specific inbound deal before close — when sales has asked for a discount that exceeds AE authority, when the customer has redlined the MSA, when per-deal economics (margin after discount, multi-year payment shape, indemnity exposure) need to be quantified, or when discount approval needs to be routed to a named human approver (Sales Director, VP Sales, CFO, CRO, General Counsel). Covers deal review, discount approval routing, per-deal margin scoring, deal exception handling, MSA redline triage, contract landmine detection (uncapped indemnity, MFN, perpetual license-back, missing DPA), and named-approver chain assembly. NEVER auto-approves — every output is a numeric scorecard plus a routing recommendation to a named human.

Published by @Alireza Rezvani·0 agent reads / 30d·0 saves·

deal-desk

Per-deal review and discount-approval routing. Scores deal margin + risk, routes discount approval to the right human, redlines T&Cs against commercial policy. Never auto-approves. Every output is a score plus a routing recommendation to a named human approver.

Purpose

Deal Desk / RevOps / sales leadership live at the moment between sales-team-asks-for-discount and CFO/CRO/legal-signs. This skill quantifies the asks and routes them.

Three deterministic tools:

  1. deal_scorer.py — Scores a deal 0-100 across 5 dimensions (margin, risk, strategic value, commercial fit, term shape) and assigns one of four verdicts: APPROVE / REVIEW / ESCALATE / DECLINE — each tied to a named approver chain.
  2. discount_approval_router.py — Maps a discount-percent + deal-size + tier to a named approver chain (AE → Manager → Director → VP → CFO/CRO) with estimated cycle days. Honors industry-tuned policy bands.
  3. terms_redliner.py — Detects 10 founder/seller-killer patterns in deal terms (uncapped indemnity, MFN, perpetual license-back, missing DPA, NET-60+, broad non-solicit, etc.) with severity + standard counter + named legal/commercial approver.

When to use

Invoke this skill when:

  • Sales has flagged a discount request above AE authority.
  • A customer has returned a redlined MSA and you need triage before routing to legal.
  • The deal needs CFO sign-off and you want a defensible margin breakdown.
  • An RFP response requires multi-year terms and you need to score the shape.
  • A renewal expansion is bundled with a discount and you need to verify policy fit.
  • You're building a deal-desk approval queue and need consistent routing.

Do NOT use this skill to: author the proposal (use business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writer), redesign the discount matrix (use the commercial-policy sibling skill), or do deep legal redline of full contract text (use c-level-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisor).

Workflow

  1. Intake the deal — Sales/AE fills assets/deal_intake_template.md with ARR, term, discount, payment terms, customer tier, strategic flags, and any customer-flagged term redlines (20-min fill-out).
  2. Score margin + risk — Run deal_scorer.py --input deal.json --profile {saas|enterprise-software|services|marketplace}. Read the composite + per-dimension breakdown + verdict.
  3. Route the discount — Run discount_approval_router.py --input deal.json --profile <same>. Get the named approver chain + estimated cycle days. Modifiers (enterprise floor, SMB fast-lane) are surfaced explicitly.
  4. Flag the redlines — Run terms_redliner.py --input deal_terms.json. Get ranked CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW findings with the counter-language and the approver who must sign each.
  5. Assemble the packet — Combine the three outputs into a deal-desk review packet. Always include the named approver chain. The packet is a recommendation, not an approval.

Scripts

ScriptPurposeIndustry profiles
scripts/deal_scorer.py5-dimension scorecard with verdict + chainsaas, enterprise-software, services, marketplace
scripts/discount_approval_router.pyDiscount % → named approver chain + cycle dayssaas, enterprise-software, services, marketplace
scripts/terms_redliner.py10-pattern landmine scanner with countersn/a (terms-driven)

All three: stdlib-only, --help, --sample, --input <json>, --output {human,json}.

References

  • references/deal_desk_canon.md — Deal-desk operating practice: SaaStr playbooks (Jason Lemkin), Winning by Design (van der Kooij + Reichl), Forrester research, RevOps Co-op, OpenView benchmarks, Bridge Group AE comp, Salesforce Deal Desk best practices.
  • references/discount_economics.md — Discount math + LTV impact: David Skok (For Entrepreneurs), Bessemer State of the Cloud, Tomasz Tunguz, OpenView NRR research, Pacific Crest + KeyBanc SaaS surveys, Insight Partners revenue ops. Includes worked margin math (a 30% discount on an 80% gross-margin product loses 37.5% of margin, not 30%).
  • references/contract_landmines.md — 10+ named landmine patterns with example counter-language: YC startup library, Robert Klingberg (Founder's Guide to SaaS Agreements), Bowman + Brooke redline guides, IACCM/WorldCC commercial management research, Practical Law contracts library, Bradley Tusk on enterprise contracts, GC100 guidance.

Assumptions

  • The skill assumes the commercial policy already exists (discount bands, payment-terms norms, indemnity caps). It applies the policy; it does not design it. See the commercial-policy sibling skill for policy design.
  • Industry profiles bake in customary thresholds. If your company has a documented discount matrix, pass it via policy_thresholds in the input JSON to override.
  • The terms redliner detects the 10 most common landmines. It is not a substitute for General Counsel review on the full contract.
  • Scoring weights (margin 30%, risk 20%, strategic 15%, commercial 20%, term 15%) reflect a CFO-leaning bias. RevOps-led shops may want to reweight; the weights are constants at the top of score_deal() and are easy to tune.

Anti-patterns

  • Auto-approving deals. This skill never says "approved". Every verdict (including APPROVE) names the human(s) who must sign. The output is a recommendation.
  • Skipping the redline scan because the score is high. A high composite with UNCAPPED_INDEMNITY is still a DECLINE — critical signals override composite.
  • Using this for legal review of arbitrary contract text. This skill takes a structured terms JSON. For prose redlining, use c-level-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisor/scripts/contract_risk_scanner.py.
  • Treating the discount router as a discount calculator. It routes a discount the AE/customer has already proposed; it does not calculate the right discount. Pricing logic lives in commercial/skills/pricing-strategist.
  • Routing every deal to CFO. The router stops at the lowest-authority hop that can sign the deal. Over-escalation slows the funnel and trains AEs to over-discount.
  • Hand-editing the chain to skip a hop. Modifiers (enterprise floor, SMB fast-lane) are explicit; hidden skips defeat the audit trail.

Distinct from

SiblingScopeDifference
commercial/skills/pricing-strategistSets the pricing model (per-seat vs usage vs tiered, list prices, packaging)Operates at the strategy layer — not per deal
business-growth/contract-and-proposal-writerAuthors proposals, SOWs, MSAsOutput is a document; deal-desk is the gate before signing
commercial/skills/commercial-policy (sibling)Designs the discount matrix and approval thresholdsDeal-desk applies that policy to one deal at a time
c-level-advisor/skills/general-counsel-advisorDeep legal redline + term-sheet analysisOperates on full contract prose; deal-desk uses structured terms JSON
c-level-advisor/skills/cfo-advisorBurn rate, unit economics, fundraising modelsStrategic finance; deal-desk is one-deal granularity

Quick examples

# Score a deal
python3 scripts/deal_scorer.py --sample
python3 scripts/deal_scorer.py --input my_deal.json --profile enterprise-software

# Route the discount
python3 scripts/discount_approval_router.py --sample
python3 scripts/discount_approval_router.py --input my_deal.json --profile saas

# Flag the redlines
python3 scripts/terms_redliner.py --sample
python3 scripts/terms_redliner.py --input my_deal_terms.json --output json

The sample (a 28%-discount enterprise SaaS deal with uncapped indemnity + MFN) correctly DECLINEs at 52.7 / 100 composite — the 28% discount destroys 35.9% of the deal's margin dollars under fixed COGS — and routes to AE → Deal Desk → VP Sales → CFO → CRO → General Counsel.

Forcing-question library (Matt Pocock grill discipline)

Walked one at a time by /cs:grill-commercial or the Commercial orchestrator. Recommended answer + canon citation per question. Never bundled.

  1. "What's the gross margin at full discount, AND what does next quarter's pipeline look like at the same terms?" Recommended: model both. Refuse to approve until the AE can articulate the precedent risk. Canon: David Skok (For Entrepreneurs — discount math), Tomasz Tunguz benchmarks. Anti-pattern: one 40% precedent reshapes 3 quarters of pipeline.

  2. "Is this discount inside or outside the standard discount matrix?" Recommended: if outside, surface the policy exception explicitly and route to the named exception approver. Canon: OpenView discount benchmarks, RevOps Co-op playbooks.

  3. "What's the strategic value beyond ARR — logo, reference, expansion path?" Recommended: require a named, verifiable expansion or reference commitment in writing. Canon: SaaStr (Jason Lemkin) on logo discounts; Winning by Design on commitment language.

  4. "Has the customer signed an indemnity cap, a liability cap, and a DPA (if EU data)?" Recommended: required. Uncapped indemnity is a critical-signal override that blocks APPROVE regardless of margin. Canon: WorldCC (formerly IACCM) commercial management research, GC100 contract guidance.

  5. "What payment terms — NET-30, NET-45, or NET-60+?" Recommended: prefer NET-30; NET-45+ is a cash flow drag worth quantifying. Canon: KeyBanc SaaS Survey, Pacific Crest data — every 15 days of payment terms costs ~2% of effective deal value.

  6. "Is the term multi-year with annual prepay, or annual auto-renew?" Recommended: multi-year prepay > annual prepay > annual auto-renew. Auto-renew without 60-day notice is a redline. Canon: Salesforce Deal Desk best practices, OpenView NRR studies.

  7. "Who is the named human approver at each hop of the discount chain?" Recommended: surface the name, not just the role. "VP Sales" is not an approver; "Maria Singh, VP Sales" is. Canon: Bridge Group SaaS AE compensation research — named approval reduces precedent drift by 50%+.

Walk depth-first. Lock 1-4 before opening 5-7. After all 7 are answered, invoke deal_scorer.pydiscount_approval_router.pyterms_redliner.py in sequence.

Bundled with this artifact

9 files

Reference files that ship alongside this artifact. Agents pull these in only when the task needs them.

More on the bench

SKILL0

Unit Economics

description: Analyze unit economics for PE targets — ARR cohorts, LTV/CAC, net retention, payback periods, revenue quality, and margin waterfall. Essential for software/SaaS, recurring revenue, and subscription businesses. Use when evaluating revenue quality, building a cohort analysis, or assessing customer economics. Triggers on "unit economics", "cohort analysis", "ARR analysis", "LTV CAC", "net retention", "revenue quality", or "customer economics".

finance+1
0
SKILL0

Funding Digest

Generate a polished one-page PowerPoint slide summarizing key takeaways from recent funding rounds and notable capital markets activity across a user's watched sectors or companies. Use this skill when the user asks for a deal flow summary, weekly recap, funding digest, transaction roundup, or capital markets briefing. Triggers on: 'deal flow digest', 'weekly funding recap', 'deal roundup', 'transaction summary this week', 'what happened in [sector] this week', 'capital markets update', or any request to compile recent funding activity into a briefing slide. Produces a professional single-slide PPTX with key takeaways, valuation data, and Capital IQ deal links.

finance+1
0
SKILL0

Sector Overview

description: Create comprehensive industry and sector landscape reports covering market dynamics, competitive positioning, key players, and thematic trends. Use for client requests, sector initiations, thematic research pieces, or internal knowledge building. Triggers on "sector overview", "industry report", "market landscape", "sector analysis", "industry deep dive", or "thematic research".

finance+2
0