Nemo Mbridge Perf Activation Recompute

Validate and use selective and full activation recompute in Megatron Bridge to reduce GPU memory usage at the cost of extra compute.

Published by @NVIDIA·from NVIDIA/skills·0 agent reads / 30d·0 saves·

Activation Recompute

Stable docs: @docs/training/activation-recomputation.md Card: @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-activation-recompute/card.yaml

Answer Checklist

For OOM or CUDA graph questions, lead with this exact sequence:

  1. First try PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True; many borderline failures are allocator fragmentation, not activation capacity.
  2. Prefer selective recompute before full-layer recompute: recompute_granularity="selective" with recompute_modules=["core_attn"].
  3. If still borderline, optionally add "layernorm"; use "mlp" only as a last resort because it has a large compute cost on wide dense FFNs.
  4. Use full-layer recompute only after selective recompute fails to fit, and always name the required fields: recompute_granularity="full", recompute_method, and recompute_num_layers.
  5. If FP8 or TE-scoped CUDA graphs are enabled, call out the assertion risk: full-layer recompute is incompatible with TE scopes such as attn, mlp, and moe_router. Valid fixes are selective recompute, cuda_graph_impl="none", or cuda_graph_impl="local" with cuda_graph_scope="full_iteration".

What It Is

Activation recompute trades GPU compute for memory by discarding intermediate activations during the forward pass and recomputing them during backward. Megatron Bridge supports two granularities:

GranularityWhat you specifyWhat gets recomputedMemory savingsCompute cost
selectiverecompute_modules list (e.g. core_attn, mlp)specific submodules within each layermoderate (module-dependent)low to high
fullrecompute_num_layers + recompute_methodentire transformer layers (N layers)strongesthighest

Note: MCore names these "selective" (submodule-level) vs "full" (layer-level). "Full" means recomputing full layers, not the full model — you still choose how many layers via recompute_num_layers.

Quick Decision

  1. Set PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True first — most borderline OOMs are caused by memory fragmentation, not capacity. This fixes it at zero cost. See @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-memory-tuning/SKILL.md.
  2. Start with recompute_granularity=selective, recompute_modules=[core_attn] (often already the default in recipes).
  3. Add layernorm to recompute modules — nearly free compute-wise but saves negligible memory. Only helps in extremely borderline cases.
  4. Add mlp as a last resort — saves ~3 GB but costs ~16% GPU utilization on large dense models (Llama3 70B).
  5. Use recompute_granularity=full only when selective recompute still does not fit.

CPU offloading (cpu_offloading=True) is an alternative that avoids recompute cost entirely, but it is incompatible with PP > 1.

Enablement

Selective recompute

cfg.model.recompute_granularity = "selective"
cfg.model.recompute_modules = ["core_attn"]  # add "layernorm", "mlp", or other valid modules as needed

Full-layer recompute

cfg.model.recompute_granularity = "full"
cfg.model.recompute_method = "uniform"
cfg.model.recompute_num_layers = 4

Available recompute_modules

ModuleWhat it recomputesCompute costMemory savings
core_attnattention softmax/dropout/QKV dot productlow (Flash Attention already recomputes internally)moderate
layernormlayer normalizationnegligible (~0%)negligible
mlpfull FFN blockhigh (~16% on Llama3 70B, hidden=28672)~3 GB
moeMoE expert dispatchvariesvaries
moe_actMoE activation functionslowsmall
shared_expertsshared expert layersmoderatemoderate
mla_up_projMulti-Latent Attention up projectionmoderatemoderate

Performance harness CLI

python scripts/performance/run_performance_workload.py \
  --recompute_granularity selective \
  --recompute_modules core_attn layernorm \
  ...

Compatibility and Constraints

  • recompute_granularity=selective requires a non-empty recompute_modules list
  • recompute_granularity=full requires recompute_method and recompute_num_layers
  • Layer-level recompute (recompute_granularity="full" + recompute_num_layers) is incompatible with TE-scoped CUDA graphs. MCore calls this "full" granularity — the name refers to recomputing full transformer layers, not the full model. Even though you're selecting how many layers to recompute, MCore treats it differently from submodule recompute. Any TE-scoped scope (attn, mlp, moe_router, etc.) will assert. This commonly hits FP8 configs that enable TE-scoped graphs by default (e.g. LLAMA3_70B_SFT_CONFIG_H100_FP8_CS_V1 sets cuda_graph_impl="transformer_engine", cuda_graph_scope="mlp"). Options:
    • use submodule recompute (recompute_granularity="selective" + recompute_modules) — compatible with TE-scoped graphs
    • disable CUDA graphs (cuda_graph_impl="none") and use layer-level recompute
    • switch to cuda_graph_impl="local", cuda_graph_scope="full_iteration"
  • distribute_saved_activations=True cannot be combined with sequence_parallel=True
  • Combining mlp + core_attn recompute is slightly worse than mlp alone due to double recompute overhead

Measured Results

Llama3 70B SFT on 32x H100 80GB, FP8 (Current Scaling):

  • Baseline: TP=4, PP=4, VPP=5, DP=2, MBS=1, GBS=32, seq_len=4096
  • Golden GPU utilization: 709.93 TFLOP/s/GPU
  • Regression threshold: 5%
Experimentrecompute_modulesTFLOP/s/GPUvs GoldenPeak Mem (GB)Result
Baseline[core_attn]~704-0.8%58.8 (OOM rank0)OOM
Exp 1[mlp]593.6-16.4%55.6Perf regression
Exp 2[mlp, core_attn]586.8-17.3%55.6Perf regression
Exp 3[core_attn, layernorm]~702-1.1%59.6 (OOM rank0)OOM

Key takeaways:

  • layernorm recompute is nearly free compute-wise but saves negligible memory
  • mlp recompute saves ~3 GB peak but costs ~16% because the Llama3 70B FFN (hidden=28672) is expensive to recompute
  • Combining mlp + core_attn is slightly worse than mlp alone
  • For this workload, the actual OOM fix was PYTORCH_CUDA_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True (memory fragmentation, not capacity). See @skills/nemo-mbridge-perf-memory-tuning/SKILL.md.

Code Anchors

Recompute modules enum and selective checkpoint logic

# 3rdparty/Megatron-LM/megatron/core/transformer/transformer_block.py
# _checkpointed_forward() applies selective recompute based on recompute_modules

Recompute config validation

# 3rdparty/Megatron-LM/megatron/core/transformer/transformer_config.py
# Validates recompute_granularity, recompute_method, recompute_num_layers

Llama3 recipe defaults

    # Memory saving (recompute & offloading)
    cfg.model.recompute_granularity = None
    cfg.model.recompute_modules = None
    cfg.model.fine_grained_activation_offloading = False
    cfg.model.offload_modules = None

Full recompute + CUDA graph assertion (MCore)

            if self.recompute_granularity:
                if self.recompute_granularity != "selective":
                    assert self.cuda_graph_scope == [
                        CudaGraphScope.full_iteration
                    ], "full recompute is only supported with full iteration CUDA graph."

CPU offloading PP incompatibility (MCore)

        if self.cpu_offloading and self.pipeline_model_parallel_size > 1:
            raise ValueError(
                "Currently there is no support for Pipeline parallelism with CPU offloading"
            )

Failure Diagnosis

SymptomCauseConfirmFix
>15% GPU utilization dropmlp recompute on large FFNcheck recompute_modules includes mlpcheck expandable_segments:True is set; consider reducing MBS
Still OOM after adding layernormlayernorm activations are too smallcompare peak memory before/afteradd mlp recompute or check expandable_segments:True
AssertionError: full recompute is only supported with full iteration CUDA graphlayer-level recompute (recompute_granularity=full + recompute_num_layers) with TE-scoped graphs. FP8 CS configs default to cuda_graph_impl=transformer_engine, scope=mlp.check cuda_graph_impl and cuda_graph_scopeuse submodule recompute (selective + recompute_modules), or cuda_graph_impl=none, or local + full_iteration
ValueError: PP + CPU offloadingcpu_offloading=True with pipeline_model_parallel_size > 1check PP configdisable CPU offloading or set PP=1
mlp+core_attn worse than mlp alonedouble recompute overheadcompare Exp 1 vs Exp 2use mlp alone

Known Limitations

  • Per-module memory savings vary significantly by model architecture and hidden dimension
  • No automatic module selection — users must choose which modules to recompute
  • layernorm recompute is almost never worth it as a standalone fix
  • CPU offloading (the zero-compute-cost alternative) is blocked when PP > 1

Verification

uv run python -m pytest \
  tests/unit_tests/training/test_config.py -k "recompute" -q

Success criteria:

  • Unit tests pass for recompute config validation
  • No assertion errors from config validation

Bundled with this artifact

5 files

Reference files that ship alongside this artifact. Agents pull these in only when the task needs them.

More on the bench

SKILL▲0

Autoskill

Observe the user's screen via screenpipe, detect repeated research workflows, match them against existing scientific-agent-skills, and draft new skills (or composition recipes that chain existing ones) for the patterns not yet covered. Use when the user asks to analyze their recent work and propose skills based on what they actually do. Requires the screenpipe daemon (https://github.com/screenpipe/screenpipe) running locally on port 3030 — the skill has no other data source and will refuse to run if screenpipe is unreachable. All detection runs locally; only redacted cluster summaries reach the LLM.

ai-prompt-engineering+2
⊙ 1
SKILL▲0

Whisper

OpenAI's general-purpose speech recognition model. Supports 99 languages, transcription, translation to English, and language identification. Six model sizes from tiny (39M params) to large (1550M params). Use for speech-to-text, podcast transcription, or multilingual audio processing. Best for robust, multilingual ASR.

data-science-ml+2
⊙ 0
SKILL▲0

Guidance

Control LLM output with regex and grammars, guarantee valid JSON/XML/code generation, enforce structured formats, and build multi-step workflows with Guidance - Microsoft Research's constrained generation framework

ai-prompt-engineering+2
⊙ 0