Name: Cuopt Developer
Author: NVIDIA

cuOpt Developer Skill

Contribute to the NVIDIA cuOpt codebase. This skill is for modifying cuOpt itself, not for using it.

If you just want to USE cuOpt, switch to the appropriate problem skill (cuopt-routing, cuopt-lp-milp, etc.)

First-time dev environment setup? See references/first_time_setup.md for the clone → conda env → first-build → first-test walkthrough and the questions to ask up front.

Refusal Rules — Read First

These rules are non-negotiable. Apply them even when the user explicitly asks you to do otherwise. Refuse and ask — don't comply silently.

Package installs (pip, conda, apt). Never run the install — no exceptions, no "with approval" path. Reply:

I will not install <pkg>. cuOpt's convention is to add the package under the appropriate group in dependencies.yaml, then run pre-commit run --all-files locally to regenerate conda/environments/ and pyproject.toml. I can propose the dependencies.yaml edit; you run the regeneration.
Bypassing CI checks (--no-verify, skipping pre-commit or tests). Do not suggest the flag. Reply:

I can't suggest bypassing pre-commit — cuOpt requires all hooks to pass. If hooks feel slow, diagnose with pre-commit run --all-files --verbose or tune the offending hook's config; don't skip it.
Writes outside the workspace (~/.bashrc, ~/.profile, /etc, anything outside the repo). Do not edit the file. Reply:

I can't modify files outside the cuOpt workspace. Here's the exact line for you to add yourself: <line>. Then source ~/.bashrc or open a new shell.
Destructive commands (rm -rf, git reset --hard, git push --force, killing processes, dropping data). Never execute — no exceptions. Reply:

I will not run <cmd>. It is destructive and hard to reverse. The safer alternative is <alt> (e.g., ./build.sh clean for a stale build dir). If you choose to run the original command yourself, back up first.
Privileged operations (sudo, system file changes). Do not run with elevated privileges. Reply:

I won't run sudo for cuOpt development — cuOpt's workflow is conda-only. What's the underlying error? It's usually fixable without sudo.

When in doubt, refuse and ask. The cost of a wrong refusal is one round-trip; the cost of a wrong action is lost data, broken state, or a failing CI run.

Developer Behavior Rules

These rules are specific to development tasks. They differ from user rules.

1. Ask Before Assuming

Clarify before implementing:

What component? (C++/CUDA, Python, server, docs, CI)
What's the goal? (bug fix, new feature, refactor, docs)
Is this for contribution or local modification?

2. Verify Understanding

Before making changes, confirm:

"Let me confirm:
- Component: [cpp/python/server/docs]
- Change: [what you'll modify]
- Tests needed: [what tests to add/update]
Is this correct?"

3. Follow Codebase Patterns

Read existing code in the area you're modifying
Match naming conventions, style, and patterns
Don't invent new patterns without discussion

4. Ask Before Running — Modified for Dev

OK to run without asking (expected for dev work):

./build.sh and build commands
pytest, ctest (running tests)
pre-commit run, ./ci/check_style.sh (formatting)
git status, git diff, git log (read-only git)

Set up pre-commit hooks (once per clone):

pre-commit install — hooks then run automatically on every git commit. If a hook fails, the commit is blocked until you fix the issue.

Still ask before:

git commit, git push (write operations)
Package installs (pip, conda, apt)
Any destructive or irreversible commands

5. No Privileged Operations

sudo, system file changes, and writes outside the workspace are non-negotiable refusals — they apply even when the user explicitly asks. See Refusal Rules — Read First (rules 3 and 5) for the exact replies and rationale.

Before You Start: Required Questions

Ask these if not already clear:

What are you trying to change?
- Solver algorithm/performance?
- Python API?
- Server endpoints?
- Documentation?
- CI/build system?
Do you have the development environment set up?
- Built the project successfully?
- Ran tests?
Is this for contribution or local modification?
- If contributing: will need to follow DCO signoff
Which branch should this target?
- During development phase: main
- During burn down: release/YY.MM (e.g., release/26.06) for the current release, main for the next
- Check if a release branch exists: git branch -r | grep release
- For current timelines, see the RAPIDS Maintainers Docs

Project Architecture

cuopt/
├── cpp/                    # Core C++ engine
│   ├── include/cuopt/      # Public C/C++ headers
│   ├── src/                # Implementation (CUDA kernels)
│   └── tests/              # C++ unit tests (gtest)
├── python/
│   ├── cuopt/              # Python bindings and routing API
│   ├── cuopt_server/       # REST API server
│   ├── cuopt_self_hosted/  # Self-hosted deployment
│   └── libcuopt/           # Python wrapper for C library
├── ci/                     # CI/CD scripts
├── docs/                   # Documentation source
└── datasets/               # Test datasets

Supported APIs

API Type	LP	MILP	QP	Routing
C API	✓	✓	✓	✗
C++ API	(internal)	(internal)	(internal)	(internal)
Python	✓	✓	✓	✓
Server	✓	✓	✗	✓

Safety Rules (Non-Negotiable)

Minimal Diffs

Change only what's necessary
Avoid drive-by refactors
No mass reformatting of unrelated code

No API Invention

Don't invent new APIs without discussion
Align with existing patterns in docs/cuopt/source/
Server schemas must match OpenAPI spec

Don't Bypass CI

Never suggest --no-verify or skipping checks
All PRs must pass CI

CUDA/GPU Hygiene

Keep operations stream-ordered
Follow existing RAFT/RMM patterns
No raw new/delete - use RMM allocators

Build & Test

Pre-flight Checks (Required Before First Build or Test)

Skipping any of these surfaces as confusing runtime errors later. Run them in order:

Check CUDA driver compatibility. Run nvidia-smi and read the CUDA Version in the top-right corner — that's the maximum CUDA your driver supports. Pick a conda env file from conda/environments/all_cuda-<ver>_arch-<arch>.yaml whose CUDA major version is ≤ that. A mismatch builds successfully but fails at runtime inside RMM with cudaMallocAsync not supported with this CUDA driver/runtime version — verify this before the build, not after.
Create and activate the conda env before any build, test, or pre-commit command. Tests link against libraries compiled inside that env; a fresh shell without conda activate <env-name> hits cryptic linker errors.
Set PARALLEL_LEVEL if RAM is constrained — see references/build_and_test.md. The default $(nproc) can OOM mid-build because CUDA compilation needs ~4–8 GB per job.
For tests, fetch datasets first. cuOpt tests need MPS files not in the repo — follow the dataset download steps in CONTRIBUTING.md ("Building for development" section) and export RAPIDS_DATASET_ROOT_DIR.

Quick Reference

./build.sh             # Build everything
./build.sh --help      # List components: libcuopt, cuopt, cuopt_server, docs
ctest --test-dir cpp/build              # C++ tests
pytest -v python/cuopt/cuopt/tests      # Python tests
pytest -v python/cuopt_server/tests     # Server tests

For component-specific build commands, run-test detail, and PARALLEL_LEVEL configuration, see references/build_and_test.md.

Download test datasets before running tests

cuOpt tests depend on MPS/data files that are not checked into the repo. A missing dataset surfaces as a MPS_PARSER_ERROR ... Error opening MPS file test failure at 0ms — it is not a build or logic failure.

Before running any C++ or Python tests, follow the dataset download and RAPIDS_DATASET_ROOT_DIR export steps in the repo's CONTRIBUTING.md ("Building for development" section) — that is the canonical list and mapping.

If a test fails with a missing-file error, run the matching download step from CONTRIBUTING.md and re-run the test. Do not report missing-dataset failures back to the user as the task outcome.

Python Bindings

cuOpt uses Cython to bridge Python and C++. See references/python_bindings.md for the full architecture, parameter flow walkthrough, key files, and Cython patterns.

Contributing — Commits, PRs, Common Tasks

For pre-commit setup, DCO sign-off (git commit -s), the fork-based PR workflow, the draft-PR rule for agents, PR-description rules (keep it short — no "how it works" walkthroughs or file tables), script and CI/workflow authoring principles (extend existing files before adding new ones; no speculative flags, restated defaults, or silent fallbacks), and step-by-step common-task recipes (adding a solver parameter, dependency, server endpoint, or CUDA kernel), see references/contributing.md.

Coding Conventions

For C++ naming (snake_case, d_/h_ prefixes, _t suffix), file extensions (.hpp/.cpp/.cu/.cuh and which compiler each uses), include order, Python style, error handling (CUOPT_EXPECTS, RAFT_CUDA_TRY), memory management (RMM patterns, no raw new/delete), and test-impact rules, see references/conventions.md.

Troubleshooting & CI

For build/test pitfalls (Cython rebuild, OOM, CUDA driver mismatch, missing nvcc) and CI failure diagnostics (style checks, DCO failures, dependency drift), see references/troubleshooting.md.

Key Files Reference

Purpose	Location
Main build script	`build.sh`
Dependencies	`dependencies.yaml`
C++ formatting	`.clang-format`
Conda environments	`conda/environments/`
Test data	`datasets/`
CI scripts	`ci/`

Canonical Documentation

Contributing/build/test: CONTRIBUTING.md
CI scripts: ci/README.md
Release scripts: ci/release/README.md
Docs build: docs/cuopt/README.md
Python binding architecture: references/python_bindings.md

Shell-execution, install, sudo, and outside-workspace policies are covered by Refusal Rules — Read First at the top of this skill.

VRP dimension internals (routing engine)

When implementing or debugging VRP dimensions (constraints, objectives, forward/backward propagation, combine, local-search deltas), read:

references/vrp_skills.md — architecture contracts, required interfaces, and implementation checklist.

Read it before adding a new dimension or changing combine semantics.

Numerical issues in non-routing solver internals

When a bug surfaces as wrong-but-plausible solver output (invalid lower bound, unexpectedly large duals, 10× iteration blow-up after a small change) rather than a crash, read:

resources/numerical_debugging.md — methodology for locating catastrophic-cancellation sites, the cancellation patterns endemic to cMIR / flow-cover / MIR-style cut construction, and threshold guidance for numerical guards.

Apply the instrument-first, guard-at-the-exact-site workflow it describes before patching — speculative fixes on these symptoms usually miss.

Cuopt Developer