Report Generation

Format accessibility audit reports with severity scoring (0-100, A-F grades), scorecard computation, and compliance exports including VPAT/ACR and remediation priorities.

Published by @Community-Access·from Community-Access/accessibility-agents·0 agent reads / 30d·0 saves·

Report Generation

Report File

Default output: DOCUMENT-ACCESSIBILITY-AUDIT.md in the project root.

Required Sections

Every audit report MUST include these sections:

  1. Audit Information - date, auditor, profile, scope, counts
  2. Executive Summary - totals, pass rate, most common issue, effort estimate
  3. Cross-Document Patterns - recurring issues, systemic failures
  4. Findings by File - per-document issues with rule ID, severity, location, WCAG, impact, remediation
  5. Findings by Rule (Cross-Reference) - rule-level aggregation across files
  6. What Passed - acknowledge clean documents and categories
  7. Remediation Priority - ordered by impact (Immediate / Soon / When Possible)
  8. Accessibility Scorecard - per-document scores and grades
  9. Metadata Dashboard - document properties health
  10. Confidence Summary - breakdown by confidence level

Optional Sections (include when applicable)

  • Template Analysis - when batch scanning detects shared templates
  • Comparison Report - when re-scanning against a baseline
  • CI/CD Recommendations - when no config files exist

Severity Scoring Formula

Document Score = 100 - (sum of weighted findings)

Weights:
  Error (high confidence):   -10 points
  Error (medium confidence):  -7 points
  Error (low confidence):     -3 points
  Warning (high confidence):  -3 points
  Warning (medium confidence):-2 points
  Warning (low confidence):   -1 point
  Tips:                        0 points

Floor: 0 (minimum score)

Score Grades

ScoreGradeMeaning
90-100AExcellent - minor or no issues
75-89BGood - some warnings, few errors
50-74CNeeds Work - multiple errors
25-49DPoor - significant accessibility barriers
0-24FFailing - critical barriers, likely unusable with AT

Organization Modes

ModeDescriptionBest For
By fileGroup all issues under each documentSmall batches (< 10 files)
By issue typeGroup all instances of each rule across documentsSeeing patterns
By severityCritical first, then serious, moderate, minorPrioritizing fixes

VPAT/ACR Compliance Export

Conformance Levels

LevelCriteria
SupportsNo findings for this WCAG criterion across any document
Partially SupportsSome documents pass, some fail
Does Not SupportAll or most documents fail
Not ApplicableCriterion does not apply to scanned document types

Supported VPAT Editions

  • VPAT 2.5 (WCAG) - maps to WCAG 2.2 criteria
  • VPAT 2.5 (508) - maps to Revised Section 508 standards
  • VPAT 2.5 (EN 301 549) - maps to EU accessibility directive
  • VPAT 2.5 (INT) - International edition (all three combined)

Remediation Tracking

When comparing against a baseline audit report:

StatusMeaning
FixedIssue was in previous report but is now resolved
NewIssue was not in previous report but appears now
PersistentIssue remains from previous report
RegressedIssue was previously fixed but has returned

Progress Metrics

  • Issue reduction percentage: (fixed / previous_total) * 100
  • Score change: current_score - previous_score
  • Documents improved: count of documents with higher scores

More on the bench

SKILL0

Fixing Metadata

Audit and fix HTML metadata including page titles, meta descriptions, canonical URLs, Open Graph tags, Twitter cards, favicons, JSON-LD structured data, and robots directives. Use when adding SEO metadata, fixing social share previews, reviewing Open Graph tags, setting up canonical URLs, or shipping new pages that need correct meta tags.

ux-product-design+1
29
SKILL0

Pptx Slide Auditor

Audit a PowerPoint presentation for layout issues, text overflow, visual hierarchy problems, and consistency gaps. Use when asked to review a slide deck, check a presentation before a meeting, audit slides for layout problems, or QA a deck before sharing. Produces a slide-by-slide report with issues ranked by severity and specific fixes. Best used with Claude Opus 4.7 or newer for reliable slide-level vision analysis.

product-management+1
3
SKILL0

Design Critique

Gives structured, constructive feedback on any design using UX frameworks. Use when asked to critique a design, review a UI, give feedback on a Figma file or wireframe, assess a user flow, or evaluate a design against UX principles. Applies Jobs-to-be-Done, Gestalt principles, and usability heuristics to give actionable feedback with prioritised issues and specific recommendations.

ux-product-design+1
2