Inbox-Triage — Recurring Email Triage

Paired with inbox-setup. This skill consumes the 7-file knowledge base that inbox-setup writes at ${WORKSPACE}/Email/. The file contracts MUST match exactly. See references/kb_file_contract.md — this is the mirror of the setup-side contract, viewed from the read side.

Run on a recurring schedule (1–3x daily) or on demand. Classify recent emails, research new senders, generate decision recommendations, draft replies (NEVER SEND), deliver a clean report, and update the knowledge base with what was learned this run.

Invocation Triggers

"triage my inbox"
"inbox triage"
"check my email"
"run email triage"
"process my inbox"
"what's new in my email"
"handle my email"
"email triage"

Prerequisites

Required reads at start (fail-fast if missing):

Core (required):

${WORKSPACE}/Email/email-taxonomy.md — classification + report preferences
${WORKSPACE}/Email/email-patterns.md — voice, persona, templates, hard rules

Optional core (read if exists):

${WORKSPACE}/Email/evaluation-framework.md
${WORKSPACE}/Email/rate-card.md

Evolving (read AND update every run):

${WORKSPACE}/Email/blocklist.md
${WORKSPACE}/Email/tracker.md

Output:

${WORKSPACE}/Email/triage-log/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<run-label>.md — per-run log

If any core required file is missing → halt, direct user to run inbox-setup first. Use scripts/kb_reader.py to perform the read + validation.

DRAFTS ONLY — Never Send

This skill creates drafts. It NEVER sends.

This is the safety property that makes the skill safe to run automatically. Stated multiple times in this skill body. Non-negotiable.

The scripts/draft_safety_validator.py enforces it post-run. Any send-shaped tool call in the action log fails validation. See references/drafts_only_safety.md for the full discipline canon.

Step 0: Grill-Me Intake (Light — 0–2 Optional Override Questions)

Inbox-triage is light-intake by design — it runs on a recurring cadence with preferences pre-baked into the knowledge base from inbox-setup. The grill-me discipline here is asking ONLY the override questions that matter THIS run.

Q1 (optional, asked only when on-demand run is outside normal cadence)

Override the default 9-hour search window? Pick: yes (specify hours) / no (use default).

Why I'm asking: If you're running on-demand outside your normal 2x/day cadence, you may want a wider window (24h after a long break) or narrower (2h for a quick check).

Skip if cadence is normal.

Q2 (optional, asked only when user invokes with category-skip intent)

Skip any categories this run? E.g., "skip newsletters", "skip financial".

Why I'm asking: Sometimes you just want to scan opportunities or just want to clear active threads. Category skip narrows the run scope.

Skip if user gave no category-skip signal.

Stop condition: Max 2 questions. Default invocations skip both questions and run with KB-default preferences. The skill is optimized for fast recurring execution; intake is the exception, not the norm.

Step 1: Determine Search Window

Compute via current date math. Default lookback: 9 hours (works for 2x/day cadence with slight overlap so emails between runs aren't missed).

Use scripts/search_window_calculator.py --cadence <CADENCE> --now <ISO>:

now = current_datetime
window_start = now - 9_hours   (default for 2x-daily)
run_label = "Morning" if now.hour < 12 else "Afternoon" if now.hour < 17 else "Evening"

Cadence-to-default-window mapping (override via Q1):

Cadence (from email-taxonomy.md S1.Q5)	Default window
once daily	26h
2x daily	9h
3x daily	6h
on-demand only	24h (asks Q1)

Step 2: Email Search

Two queries (provider-agnostic adapter pattern):

Primary: Inbox + sent after window_start
Secondary: Starred unread (catch flagged items missed in primary)

Collect for each email: sender, subject, date, snippet, thread ID, labels.

Provider adapter mapping:

Provider	Tool
Gmail	Gmail MCP
Outlook / Microsoft 365	Outlook MCP
IMAP (Fastmail, ProtonMail, etc.)	IMAP MCP if available; halt otherwise
(no email tool available)	Halt with clear message: "No email tool registered for this session."

Step 3: Classification

Apply the taxonomy from email-taxonomy.md. For lowest-priority category (newsletters / automation / spam): skip thread reads entirely — context cost not worth it. For everything else: read full thread.

Step 4: Sender Research

For senders not in tracker / blocklist / prior logs:

Check blocklist.md → if matched, auto-skip
Check tracker.md → if known thread, note existing context
For opportunity senders (per evaluation framework): web search for company legitimacy, social presence, intermediary status

Skip research entirely for: known senders (in tracker), internal email, automated notifications, obvious low-priority.

Step 5: Recommendations

For decision-required emails, apply the framework from evaluation-framework.md. Categorize:

Category	When	Output
TAKE IT	Meets criteria	Recommend engaging; draft reply (Step 6)
WORTH CONSIDERING	Has potential, needs user judgment	Surface key context; draft for user to edit
PASS	Doesn't meet criteria	Brief "why" (1–3 sentences); draft polite decline
FLAG FOR REVIEW	Unusual; needs direct user decision	Surface fully; NO draft (user decides response shape)

Each: brief "why", relevant context, pricing/timeline comparison if applicable.

Skip Step 5 entirely if no evaluation-framework.md exists.

See references/triage_decision_framework.md for the framework canon.

Step 6: Drafts

For every reasonable reply candidate, create a draft using email-patterns.md voice rules.

Draft for: opportunity responses (TAKE IT / WORTH / PASS), active conversations needing reply, action items, important personal emails.

Do NOT draft for:

Clearly no-response emails (newsletters, automation, FYI)
Threads where user already replied
Blocked senders (unless new info changes the calculus)

Mechanics:

Draft only in the existing thread when possible (preserves context)
Set to, subject (Re: [original])
NEVER call any send operation. Only create drafts.

The draft body MUST honor:

Voice register from email-patterns.md
Forbidden tokens (S3.Q2 pet peeves)
Sign-off patterns
Persona context
Hard rules (S3.Q6 — non-negotiable)
Reply length per email-patterns.md

If evaluation-framework.md exists, draft tone matches recommendation:

TAKE IT → engaged + concrete next step
WORTH → curious + 1-2 clarifying questions
PASS → polite decline + brief reason (no hedging promises)
FLAG → NO draft

Step 7: Report Delivery

Honor user's preference from email-taxonomy.md "Report Preferences" section. Default: email draft to self with HTML.

Subject: Inbox Triage — [Day], [Month Date] ([Run Label])

Sections (in order):

Overview — 2–3 sentences. What happened? Anything urgent?
Stats — Counts: processed, drafts created, action needed, skipped.
Action Needed — Overdue items, decisions, drafts to review, deadlines.
Quick Reference — One line per email, alphabetical by sender. **Sender** — one-sentence summary + recommendation.
Detailed Cards — Opportunities, active threads, flags. Each: sender / subject / category, recommendation + reasoning, key context. NO draft text previews (drafts are already in email client for user to read there).
Footer — Generation timestamp + KB update summary.

Formatting (if HTML):

Inline CSS only (Gmail strips <style>)
Color-coded by recommendation:
- green → TAKE IT
- amber → WORTH CONSIDERING
- red → PASS
- purple → FLAG FOR REVIEW
- blue → active conversation

Step 8: Knowledge Base Update

blocklist.md (append new):

New declined senders + reason + date
New decline patterns from observed behavior (e.g., "all emails containing 'looking for backend engineers' from gmail addresses → cold recruiter pattern")
Remove entries if user has overridden them (user replied to a "blocked" sender → unblock)

tracker.md (append + update):

New follow-ups for emails needing future action
Update existing follow-ups (deadline changed, status changed)
Mark resolved items complete
Flag overdue items
Remove resolved items older than 30 days
Add entry to update log

Learning patterns to observe over runs:

Drafts sent as-is vs. edited vs. deleted → tone calibration signal
PASS recommendations user overrides → framework adjustment signal
Engaged vs. ignored emails → taxonomy refinement signal
New decline patterns → blocklist additions

After 5+ runs, suggest KB improvements to user (e.g., "You always decline emails from X — add as auto-skip?").

Step 9: Internal Log

Save to ${WORKSPACE}/Email/triage-log/[YYYY-MM-DD]-[run-label].md:

Emails processed with classifications
Recommendations made
Drafts created (with IDs / thread refs)
KB updates made
Follow-ups added / resolved
Notable observations (patterns surfaced, edge cases handled)

The log is the audit trail for scripts/draft_safety_validator.py to scan for send operations post-run.

Step 10: Empty Inbox Handling

Even with zero new emails:

Check tracker.md for items due today or overdue
Generate minimal report: "No new actionable emails since last run"
Flag any overdue items
Escalate per tracker rules

Skip Steps 3–6 entirely on empty inbox.

Critical Rules (Stated Multiple Times)

DRAFTS ONLY — NEVER SEND. Non-negotiable. Stated again here.
Privacy. No passwords / credentials in KB. Reference threads by ID for sensitive content.
Accuracy over speed. When unsure, flag for review. A wrong auto-draft is worse than no draft.
Respect the KB. Documented preferences are source of truth. Don't override with judgment.
Transparency. Note every KB change in the triage log.
First runs need oversight. Document this expectation for the user.

Error Handling

Situation	Behavior
KB files missing	Halt; direct user to run `inbox-setup`
Email tool unavailable	Halt with clear message about required tool
Web search unavailable for sender research	Skip research step; note senders not researched
Draft creation fails	Skip that draft; note in log; report continues
Report delivery fails	Save report to file as fallback; notify user
User has 100+ new emails	Stay within reasonable limits; flag volume; offer to focus on priority categories only
Sender appears in both blocklist and tracker	Tracker wins (active conversation); note inconsistency in log

Portability

Claude Code CLI: Native — uses Gmail / Outlook MCP, file tools for KB, web search for research.
Claude.ai web: Works when email MCP connector is connected (Gmail MCP available). Skill must check tool availability before assuming. If no email tool: halt with clear message.

Tooling

Script	Role
`scripts/kb_reader.py`	Reads + validates the 7-file KB. Returns parsed structure. Halts with explicit error if required files missing.
`scripts/search_window_calculator.py`	Computes `window_start` from cadence + current time. Returns `run_label`. Honors Q1 override.
`scripts/draft_safety_validator.py`	Post-run scan of the action log for any send-shaped tool call. FAILs if detected. The deterministic enforcement of the NEVER-SEND rule.

References

references/kb_file_contract.md — canonical 7-file contract (read perspective; mirrors ../inbox-setup/references/kb_file_contract.md)
references/triage_decision_framework.md — TAKE IT / WORTH / PASS / FLAG taxonomy
references/drafts_only_safety.md — the NEVER-SEND discipline canon

Anti-Patterns To Reject

Sending emails (drafts only — non-negotiable)
Operating without knowledge base files
Storing passwords / credentials in KB
Skipping the learning loop (KB updates) at end of run
Overriding user's documented preferences with own judgment
Reading lowest-priority threads (waste of context)
Including draft text previews in report (drafts are already in email client)
Provider lock-in without adapter pattern
Silently failing on missing tools

Version: 1.0.0 Source spec: megaprompts/07-inbox-triage-megaprompt.md Build pattern: Path B (direct conversion). Paired with inbox-setup.

Inbox Triage